England & Wales · sourced from Find Case LawMonday, 21 September 2026

Everything filed in your practice area. Not a selection.

Every judgment published on Find Case Law in the areas you follow, summarised to about five hundred words: the facts, what the court decided, the issues and its reasoning, with the legislation marked up and the official text one click away. Nothing is left out for being unimportant, because that is not our call to make.

Every summary is checked against the judgment by a second, independent pass before anyone reads it. Anything that does not pass goes to a person, not to you. How we verify → · Read one in full, free →

1210decisions in the archive
13practice areas
£19a month, one area

Read one in full, free

All 13 samples →

Property / Real Estate Law · Free sample

Domus Living Limited v Edward VII Estates Limited

[2026] UKUT 287 (LC) · United Kingdom Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) · 5 August 2026

Facts

The King Edward VII Hospital Estate at Midhurst, West Sussex, within the South Downs National Park, is a redevelopment of a former hospital and its grounds, permitted on the basis of "enabling development", whereby development that would not otherwise be permitted funds the conservation of the listed hospital buildings. In 2015 the respondent, Edward VII Estates Limited, then owner of the whole estate with planning…

Decision

The Tribunal discharged both the consent covenant (unopposed) and the planning covenant, finding it obsolete, of no practical benefit, and that its discharge would not injure the respondent; it rejected the allegation of cynical breach and held that no compensation was payable.

Read the whole summary Issues, reasoning and case history included, with no sign-up.

On this site, the facts of every case are open and the rest is for subscribers. These summaries are the exception, one per practice area, open in full so you can judge the work before paying for it:

See samples in all 13 practice areas →

How it works

Four steps, every week
  1. We collect, four times a day. Every judgment and every revision published on Find Case Law, the official record of The National Archives. We take the court’s own XML, not a scraped page, so a summary can always be traced back to the words of the court.
  2. We read the whole judgment. Not an extract, not the headnote: the full text, with no access to the internet or to any source beyond the judgment itself. Nothing from outside can get into a summary.
  3. A second pass checks it against the judgment. Independently and from scratch: are the facts supported, is the outcome stated accurately, is every authority genuinely cited, is every statutory reference right, does the reasoning belong to the judge rather than to counsel? It produces a score and a list of problems. Anything in doubt goes to a person, and is not published until it has been read.
  4. You get your areas, in full. One PDF per practice area every week, and the archive on the site. Every case names the date it was checked and links to the official judgment, so you can verify any line of it in one click.

Anyone can read the facts of any case here. What the court decided, the issues, the reasoning and the case history are for subscribers, except on the free samples, which are open in full.

Get the free weekly digest See pricing

Practice areas

One weekly PDF per area